SUMMARY OF SPEECH ACT THEORY
Austin (1962) mentions that basically when
someone says something, he also does something. Speech act theory emerges as a
reaction to descriptive fallacy, namely the view that declarative sentences are
always used to describe facts or state of affairs, which must be done correctly
or incorrectly. According to Austin, there are still many declarative sentences
that do not describe, report, or state anything, so that they cannot be
ascertained as being right or wrong. Therefore, Austin groups two types of utterances.
First the constant speech. Constantine speech is a type of utterance that
describes a factual condition, the contents of which may refer to a fact or
historical event that has actually occurred. Next is the performative
utterance. Unlike the constant utterances, performative utterances have
implications for the speaker's actions even though it is difficult to know
right or wrong because these utterances are more related to the speaker's
behavior or actions. Meanwhile, Searle (1962: 21) states speech acts are the
most basic part of communication. In 1976 Searle classified speech acts into
five parts, declarative, representative, expressive, directive, and commissive.
Declarative namely speech acts that change the world through speech.
Declarative speech is said by the speaker to create something new.
Representative is a speech that binds the speaker of the truth of what is being
said, such as facts, affirmations, conclusions, and descriptions. Expressive,
which is a type of speech act that states something that is felt by the
speaker. These speech acts reflect psychological statements in the form of
statements of joy, difficulty, joy, or misery. When using expressive speech
acts, speakers connect with their feelings. The directive, the type of speech act used
by the speaker to get someone else to do something, such as stating what the
speaker wants. These speech acts include orders, orders, requests, giving,
advice, etc. Finally, commissive speech acts. This type of speech act is
understood by speakers to bind themselves to actions in the future.

Based your explanation, you said that so that they cannot be ascertained as being right or wrong. What is the meaning of that ?
BalasHapusI can't even read this sauerkraut
BalasHapusAssalamu'alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh hi! how are you hahahahahahahahah i just need to comment your blog! nice information , it is really helpful. 😇☺☺☺
BalasHapusWhat happen sonia? I do not understand what you are describing maybe because of the writing. in my opinion this is very disturbing my concentration to read. please explain the important point only
BalasHapusWhere is your blog's creativity ???
BalasHapus